Performance Coatings

  • Volumes up 2 percent mainly driven by Marine and Protective Coatings
  • Revenue down 3 percent due to increased volumes offset by adverse currencies and unfavorable price/mix
  • EBIT and operating income up 9 percent due to higher volumes, management delayering, continuous improvement initiatives and lower costs
  • ROS* increased to 13.4 percent (2015: 11.9 percent) and ROI* increased to 30.4 percent (2015: 22.9 percent)
  • Intended acquisition of BASF’s Industrial Coatings business will strengthen our position

Revenue was down 3 percent due to higher volumes offset by adverse currencies and unfavorable price/mix. Demand trends differed per region. Volumes were up, mainly driven by Marine and Protective Coatings.

EBIT and operating income was up 9 percent due to higher volumes, management delayering, continuous improvement initiatives and lower costs.

Revenue

First quarter

 

 

 

in € millions

2015

2016

∆%

*

ROS% = EBIT/Revenue. Moving average ROI (in %) = EBIT/12 months average invested capital

Marine and Protective Coatings

353

360

2

Automotive and Specialty Coatings

388

373

(4)

Industrial and Powder Coatings

695

665

(4)

Other/intragroup eliminations

(6)

(10)

 

Total

1,430

1,388

(3)

 

 

 

 

Operating income

170

186

9

EBIT (operating income excluding incidental items)

170

186

9

ROS% *

11.9

13.4

 

 

 

 

 

Average invested capital

2,569

2,659

 

Moving average ROI (in %) *

22.9

30.4

 

 

 

 

 

EBITDA

206

222

8

Capital expenditures

29

31

 

Number of employees

19,800

19,300

 

Revenue development Q1 2016

Performance Coatings – Revenue development Q1 2016 (bar chart)Performance Coatings – Revenue development Q1 2016 (bar chart)

Marine and Protective Coatings

Revenue was up 2 percent with volume growth partly offset by unfavorable price/mix and currencies. In Protective Coatings, higher volumes were driven by project backlog, which continued from Q4, although demand was impacted by lower capital spending in the global oil and gas industries. In Marine Coatings, volumes improved due to New Build projects in Korea, partly offset by weak Maintenance and Repair activities particularly in Europe.

Automotive and Specialty Coatings

Revenue was down 4 percent with positive price/mix offset by adverse currencies and lower volumes. New business in Asia for Consumer Electronics helped to offset a general slow down in Specialty Coatings. Automotive Coatings grew, particularly in North America and Europe.

Industrial and Powder Coatings

Revenue was down 4 percent mainly due to adverse currencies and lower volumes for some segments. Demand for Coil Coatings was strong in Asia and North America, supported by favorable weather conditions, while positive developments for Packaging Coatings in Europe and Asia did not offset lower demand in Americas. Volumes for Powder Coatings were healthy, while demand was subdued for Wood Coatings.

Intended acquisition of BASF’s Industrial Coatings business

The business generated revenue of about €300 million in 2015 and supplies products for a number of end uses, including coil, furniture foil and panel coatings, wind energy and general industry, and commercial transport. The planned transaction is expected to be completed in the later part of the second half of 2016.

New ultraviolet clear coat technology developed by our Performance Coatings business now enables vehicle bodyshops to cut their energy costs by up to 80 percent. The technology (available in both Sikkens and Lesonal brands) cuts drying time to just 12 minutes without baking. This provides a significant increase in productivity – in addition to the potential energy savings – when compared with traditional baking processes. (Photo)

New ultraviolet clear coat technology developed by our Performance Coatings business now enables vehicle bodyshops to cut their energy costs by up to 80 percent. The technology (available in both Sikkens and Lesonal brands) cuts drying time to just 12 minutes without baking. This provides a significant increase in productivity – in addition to the potential energy savings – when compared with traditional baking processes.